Information Group (part of an investment holding company FINAM) held a conference on Economic crises in modern Russia: thehistory and consequences. The participants gave their assessment of the trend towards growing share of government participation in the economy. According to most experts, the State is not an effective manager, but justified his participation in the implementation of excessive market projects - primarily the infrastructure.
The crisis was marked by significant expansion of the public sector in the economy. Opinions were organized FINAM conference, to the extent indicated positive trend for the country as a whole, divided. The increase in the proportion of the state in the economy has been dictated mainly by the desire of officials to take advantage of the crisis and podmyat under a lot of assets that generate revenue and budgetary infusions, - said director of national development projects Andrey Cherepanov. - But the state itself can not be effective manager, because businesses are not managed it, and the specific officials.
According to Mr. Cherepanov, the motives of those who, on behalf of the State shall appoint the executive bodies of enterprises and control over their work, are rarely associated with ffektivnostyu: Indeed, the great efficiency of the management of the enterprises are usually not required, but the unconditional loyalty to curators from the government - yes.
In that State is the most effective managers of potential, sure, and professor of the New Economic School, CEFIR economist Natalya Volchkova. According to her, the results of many studies on a number of countries have demonstrated how comparable projects managed by the state, are more private: And as the money (for the developed countries of the type the United States - this is 2-3 times more expensive) and time (there - in 1,5-2 times longer). That is, when something can be done and the market, the participation of the state - is undesirable. For example, to produce cars. But those projects that are not under the force of the market - this is the only thing that could justify the participation of the state. As a rule, this infrastructure, that is, as a rule, public goods. The effect of state on the quality of corporate governance - clearly not a positive.
proved even more categorical view of the Director of Macroeconomic Research HSE Sergei Alexashenko, noting that he could not recall a single example of successful public management business. It does not, however, agree director of the Center for Studies of post-industrial society Vladislav Inozemtsev: I'm very bad attitude to unnecessary generalization. Mr. Alexashenko want to recall an example of Airbus, which made some European nations. Actually, a lot of goskompany were successful.
According to the Director of the Institute of Globalization Problems Mikhail Delyagin, as the experience of developed countries, in the short and medium term, the difference between public and private management is not. In doing so, adds an expert, in the long run the state as a manager is relatively inefficient, however:
1. It effectively thieves who go to free enterprise.
2. Infrastructure of the economy should not be profitable (since it is damaging to the economy as a whole), and it should be a non-profit. While we do not have public corporation under English law - the state.
3. Some companies decide to national, rather than commercial objectives - and they should be under strict state control. With weak institutions, the only way to ensure such control - property.
Mr. Delyagin also notes that in Russia the state has no control over her property and does not manage it. In this regard, the difference between private and public business is insignificant.
Experts estimate the mixed state in strengthening the economy
Information Group (part of an investment holding company FINAM) held a conference on Economic crises in modern Russia: thehistory and consequences. The participants gave their assessment of the trend towards growing share of government participation in the economy. According to most experts, the State is not an effective manager, but justified his participation in the implementation of excessive market projects - primarily the infrastructure.
The crisis was marked by significant expansion of the public sector in the economy. Opinions were organized FINAM conference, to the extent indicated positive trend for the country as a whole, divided. The increase in the proportion of the state in the economy has been dictated mainly by the desire of officials to take advantage of the crisis and podmyat under a lot of assets that generate revenue and budgetary infusions, - said director of national development projects Andrey Cherepanov. - But the state itself can not be effective manager, because businesses are not managed it, and the specific officials.
According to Mr. Cherepanov, the motives of those who, on behalf of the State shall appoint the executive bodies of enterprises and control over their work, are rarely associated with ffektivnostyu: Indeed, the great efficiency of the management of the enterprises are usually not required, but the unconditional loyalty to curators from the government - yes.
In that State is the most effective managers of potential, sure, and professor of the New Economic School, CEFIR economist Natalya Volchkova. According to her, the results of many studies on a number of countries have demonstrated how comparable projects managed by the state, are more private: And as the money (for the developed countries of the type the United States - this is 2-3 times more expensive) and time (there - in 1,5-2 times longer). That is, when something can be done and the market, the participation of the state - is undesirable. For example, to produce cars. But those projects that are not under the force of the market - this is the only thing that could justify the participation of the state. As a rule, this infrastructure, that is, as a rule, public goods. The effect of state on the quality of corporate governance - clearly not a positive.
proved even more categorical view of the Director of Macroeconomic Research HSE Sergei Alexashenko, noting that he could not recall a single example of successful public management business. It does not, however, agree director of the Center for Studies of post-industrial society Vladislav Inozemtsev: I'm very bad attitude to unnecessary generalization. Mr. Alexashenko want to recall an example of Airbus, which made some European nations. Actually, a lot of goskompany were successful.
According to the Director of the Institute of Globalization Problems Mikhail Delyagin, as the experience of developed countries, in the short and medium term, the difference between public and private management is not. In doing so, adds an expert, in the long run the state as a manager is relatively inefficient, however:
1. It effectively thieves who go to free enterprise.
2. Infrastructure of the economy should not be profitable (since it is damaging to the economy as a whole), and it should be a non-profit. While we do not have public corporation under English law - the state.
3. Some companies decide to national, rather than commercial objectives - and they should be under strict state control. With weak institutions, the only way to ensure such control - property.
Mr. Delyagin also notes that in Russia the state has no control over her property and does not manage it. In this regard, the difference between private and public business is insignificant.
Department of Public Relations and Media Investment Holdings FINAM.
Aeroflot will become the general partner of the Olympic Games in Sochi by the end of 2009
Exchange Euro /dollar traded at the Tokyo session, down down, and reached 1.4085
Recommendations on the stock market: LUKOIL, MMC Norilsk Nickel, Rostelecom, Gazprom, Mosenergo, Surgutneftegaz, Sberbank
By the end of today's trading session, the most likely return to the level of yesterday's market closing
Futures on the U.S. indices and shares on the European sites are falling, which discouraged the hunt to buy at the Russian sites
RusGidro revise the investment program to accelerate the entry of generation on Boguchanskaya HPP
Overview of the oil market for 18.08.09
Asia: the markets positive and do not smell
Technical analysis of stock on the MSCI Malaysia index